Advertisement
banner ad
2026 Ford Ranger fuel consumption
21 versions rated. Official figures from the Australian Government’s Green Vehicle Guide.
Fuel use, combined
6.8–9.4 L/100km
lower is better
Cost to run a year
$2,275–$3,145
at 14,000km
CO₂ from the exhaust
179–247 g/km
per kilometre
Uses 7% less fuel than the typical 2026 car, which averaged 7.3 L/100km.
Every 2026 Ford Ranger version
| Version | Engine | Fuel use | City | Highway | Cost/year | CO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Cab XL 4x2 Cab-chassis Auto | 2L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 6.8 | 7.6 | 6.4 | $2,275 | 179 Slightly better than average |
| Super Cab XL 4x2 Cab-chassis Auto | 2L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 6.8 | 7.6 | 6.4 | $2,275 | 179 Slightly better than average |
| Double Cab XLT 4x2 Utility Auto | 2L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 6.8 | 7.6 | 6.4 | $2,275 | 179 Slightly better than average |
| Double Cab XL 4x2 Utility Auto | 2L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 6.8 | 7.6 | 6.4 | $2,275 | 179 Slightly better than average |
| Regular Cab XL 4x4 Cab-chassis Auto | 2L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 7.1 | 8.1 | 6.6 | $2,376 | 187 Slightly worse than average |
| Super Cab XL 4x4 Cab-chassis Auto | 2L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 7.1 | 8.1 | 6.6 | $2,376 | 187 Slightly worse than average |
| Double Cab XL 4x4 Utility Auto | 2L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 7.2 | 7.9 | 6.8 | $2,409 | 190 Slightly worse than average |
| Double Cab XL 4x4 Cab-chassis Auto | 2L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 7.2 | 7.9 | 6.8 | $2,409 | 190 Slightly worse than average |
| Double Cab XLS 4WD Cab-chassis Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.3 | 9.6 | 7.5 | $2,777 | 218 Slightly worse than average |
| Regular Cab XL 4WD Cab-chassis Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.3 | 9.6 | 7.5 | $2,777 | 218 Slightly worse than average |
| Super Cab XL 4WD Cab-chassis Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.3 | 9.6 | 7.5 | $2,777 | 218 Slightly worse than average |
| Double Cab XL 4WD Cab-chassis Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.3 | 9.6 | 7.5 | $2,777 | 218 Slightly worse than average |
| Double Cab XL 4WD Utility Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.3 | 9.6 | 7.5 | $2,777 | 218 Slightly worse than average |
| Super Cab XLT 4WD Utility Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.3 | 9.6 | 7.5 | $2,777 | 218 Slightly worse than average |
| Double Cab XLT 4WD Cab-chassis Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.3 | 9.6 | 7.5 | $2,777 | 218 Slightly worse than average |
| Double Cab XLT 4WD Utility Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.3 | 9.6 | 7.5 | $2,777 | 218 Slightly worse than average |
| Double Cab SPORT 4WD Utility Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.3 | 9.6 | 7.5 | $2,777 | 218 Slightly worse than average |
| Double Cab WILDTRAK 4WD Utility Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.3 | 9.6 | 7.5 | $2,777 | 218 Slightly worse than average |
| Double Cab WILDTRAK 4WD Utility Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.4 | 9.7 | 7.6 | $2,811 | 222 Worse than average |
| Double Cab PLATINUM 4WD Utility Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.4 | 9.7 | 7.6 | $2,811 | 222 Worse than average |
| Double Cab TREMOR 4WD Utility Auto | 3L 6cyl Turbo Diesel | 9.4 | 10.6 | 8.7 | $3,145 | 247 Worse than average |
Ford Ranger in other years
Advertisement
in-page ad
Figures come from a standardised laboratory test, so every car is measured the same way. Your own fuel use will differ with traffic, load, tyre pressure and how you drive. Running costs assume 14,000km a year at recent average fuel prices.