Advertisement
banner ad
2006 Mazda BT-50 fuel consumption
6 versions rated. Official figures from the Australian Government’s Green Vehicle Guide.
Fuel use, combined
8.3–9.5 L/100km
lower is better
Cost to run a year
$2,777–$3,179
at 14,000km
CO₂ from the exhaust
219–251 g/km
per kilometre
Uses 8% less fuel than the typical 2006 car, which averaged 9.0 L/100km.
Every 2006 Mazda BT-50 version
| Version | Engine | Fuel use | City | Highway | Cost/year | CO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Cab Cab-chassis Manual | 2.5L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.3 | – | – | $2,777 | 219 Slightly worse than average |
| Single Cab Cab-chassis Manual | 2.5L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 8.5 | 10.8 | 7.2 | $2,844 | 225 Worse than average |
| Dual Cab Utility Manual | 3.0L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 9.2 | – | – | $3,078 | 243 Worse than average |
| Freestyle Cab Utility Manual | 3.0L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 9.2 | – | – | $3,078 | 243 Worse than average |
| Single Cab Utility Manual | 3.0L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 9.2 | – | – | $3,078 | 243 Worse than average |
| Single Cab Utility Manual | 3.0L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 9.2 | 11.3 | 8.0 | $3,078 | 243 Worse than average |
| Dual Cab Utility Manual | 3.0L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 9.2 | 11.3 | 8.0 | $3,078 | 243 Worse than average |
| Freestyle Cab Utility Manual | 3.0L 4cyl Turbo Diesel | 9.5 | 11.7 | 8.2 | $3,179 | 251 Worse than average |
Mazda BT-50 in other years
Advertisement
in-page ad
Figures come from a standardised laboratory test, so every car is measured the same way. Your own fuel use will differ with traffic, load, tyre pressure and how you drive. Running costs assume 14,000km a year at recent average fuel prices.